Monday, August 21, 2006

Human Trafficking is Big Business in Kentucky

KP NEWSWIRE

(Frankfort Kentucky)

August 21 2006

Getting Out The Message of a Miscarriage of Justice

Many may complain about the injustice done to them by our civil courts and family service agencies, few do anything about it. Today many Fathers, and mothers, are speaking up and becoming active in awareness campaigns to give "public notice" to a growing problem that is victimizing innocent parents and children. Wes Collins was at the state Capitol today - doing something about it.

It is a system fueled by greed, lacking in accountability, and wrought with abuses of power. The Officials (delegated authority by you and me) Claim to act in the best interests of children, when the truth is that they only act in the best interest of themselves and those who are patrons surrounding their complex. It is the Family Court Divorce and Cabinet for Health and Family Services Industrial Megaplex.

A Massive Beauracracy made up of All the judges, Lawyers, CHFS Secretaries, Commissioners, Service Region Directors, Social Services Supervisors and Workers, it also includes a vast patronage of, so called, mental health officials, parent exploitation centers, domestic violence treatment centers (for all the evil bad men).
Even patrons you wouldn't dream of who hover around this "complex" - Real estate investors. Friends of friends who help other friends with your hard earned dollars, homes, and children.

They have seized a level of power beyond the boundaries of being reasonable, and outside the scope of delegated constitutional authority. They can take control of anyones life - within a civil process - exploit you, unlawfully deprive you of your child, steal your child, and even sell it off on the adoption market. They have made it very profitable for (them), the insiders, to violate your rights, steal your home and your children. They can do this because they have the power to cover up the fraud, abuse of power, and unlawful enrichment schemes. There is no one to hold them accountable until now.

In 2004 Fayette Family Court Judge Joann Wise did just that. Allowed a fraud to affect the Process (case) Wes Collins was a party to in a divorce, allowed a fraud to be practiced upon the court by Lexington Attorney Adele Burt Brown, and joined into the fraud bringing it upon the court, by doing nothing when the facts were brought back to her regarding the extrinsic fraud committed by his former spouse, and the malpractice of Attorney Brown. False domestic violence claims were used to sabotage amicable negotiations and settlement of issues. Those being - The equal care and custody of their 2 children, and the equitable division of marital property. "now I have neither" exclaimed Wes.

Parental Alienation, a tactic when one parent draws the favor of a child, or children, and uses it as a weapon against the "target parent", occurred in the home prior to the separation in 2003 after inciting hostilities using the older child Dana (15). She was allowed to act with a rude mouth and bad behavior toward me, and rewarded for it by mom, by allowing her to be ungrounded when dad left for work. I would ground her from the telephone for her bad behavior, and mom would let her on it as soon as I went out the door, claimed Wes, "This reward system then expanded into Dana supporting the false allegations of domestic violence." it apexes on Nov 23rd 2003. while exchanging their son Jacob talking to his former spouse about the act of secretly stopping the mortgage payments in Sept 2003, Dana began to rudely interrupt the conversation in support of mom attempting to avoid the issue. Dad told her in a parentally correcting way to "hold her tongue". This resulted in Dana slapping at her father, him catching her arm to prevent being hit, and mom driving away while dad was crouched on the passenger side of the car.

That evening the Mom-Daughter duo filed a false domestic violence allegation. It was heard before Judge Wise on December 2nd 2003. At this hearing, which was an absolute kangaroo court process, Wes was found to have "must have done something to cause it" and a Domestic Violence Order entered against him, even with the complaint by "mom" stating Dana had slapped at him and then embellished with untrue additional statements, that "he was calling me and her all kinds of bad names."

The parties had an agreed order entered into record on August 19th 2003 of equal timesharing with Jacob, who was cared for in the majority, all of 2003 by Dad. That Order was arbitrarily modified by Judge Wise in this hearing, without finding the agreement unconscionable, it was done under cover of the "false allegations" hearing, and set to "the every other weekend thing". This would be the only hearing before the final decree was entered, and the beginning of a long struggle with the Court of appeals and Supreme Court.

The DV Hyperfocus of the Court was intentional, as the acts of property fraud were being swept under the Judicial Rug, in violation of the judicial duties to follow the statutory requirements in a divorce action. The Court allowed the property fraud to happen, and Wes was unable to stop his former spouse from intentionally forcing a default on the mortgage. He was under financial control and being abused under it by his former spouse. The Judge made no effort to determine the "marital status" of the parties as required by statute.(KRS 403.200) but she knew I was financially dependant to my former wifes primary income by agreement between the husband and wife, and I was powerless to stop the forced default of the mortgage on the home. Only the Judge could and she chose to join into the fraud, aiding and abetting it.

Wes took action to the Court of appeals against the judge by a Writ of Prohibition(CR 76.36 and 81) to expose the fraud and misconduct. Attorney Brown and Judge Wise were working overtime to obstruct an Appeal of the final Decree, by other acts of malpractice and misconduct, but Wes was finally able to Direct Appeal the Case. The Court of Appeals chose to "turn a blind eye" to the misconduct and malpractice, and denied intervening upon the Writ, So Wes Appealed the Denial of the Writ to the supreme Court of Kentucky.

AT THE CAPITOL

This week was what they call "court week" in Frankfort, when all of the supreme Court justices arrive and go over cases. The Awareness Campaign was in furtherance of several previous attempts to petition the SC to grant relief from the Family Court Judges Orders of March 10 2004 in which timesharing of Jacob was completely suspended by another false and frivilous Motion to the court just two weeks after the final Decree by Attorney Adele Burt Brown. Again Wes had done no wrongdoing, in fact was acting to protect his Son from hostilities of his former Spouses "new boyfriend" who was making threatening comments in the background of the phone call discussing the return of Jacob, and coming to eventually find out that this was the motive behind his former spouses previous deceptive behaviors prior to separation.

I set up around 1:30 pm outside of the east entrance where the judges and court staff go in and out. Several people stopped and became informed, many suits and ties passed by, but the only person to make a contribution to the "Justice for Jacob" donation container was a Drywall finisher who was working at the capitol. The suits and ties never offered anything in support. About 2:30 I went into the Capitol and stopped by the Office of the Attorney General where I have lodged a complaint against the Fayette County Attorney for "joining in" with Wise and Brown. Gerard Gerhart assured me there was nothing the AG's office could do, that their jurisdiction was limited to Franklin county. (utter bovine scatology) I informed him that Impeachment was an option for me if all else fails. He eventually became backed into a corner, and got upset when I said "so basically you are saying the AG does not protect the rights of private citizens from Government abuses in violations of law. He said "I didn't say that, you did." I thanked him for his time and went back outside.

At 4:30 (time for the court staff and justices to leave) two Capitol Police came up and asked if I had a permit, of which I stated the first amendment of the Constitution does not require a permit. They were polite, and offered a suggestion of another location in which they stated was a "better" free speech zone, over in a location where no judge's conscience would have to be stirred by "witnessing the event". When I mentioned the 1st amendment right, the officers became very kind and even shared their stories of "going through the process of a divorce", agreeing by nods that the "lawyers" were a big part of the problem. I agreed to call it a day. The State police officers shook my hand and smiled. I Packed up the displays and came on home.

JOIN UP

More and more people are joining in this fight against corruption in family courts and the cabinet and if you know someone who would want to be a part of this patriotic cause against tyranny, please join us at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kentuckycivilrightscouncil or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WETHEPEOPLEOFKY
get more info at: http://groups.msn.com/KentuckyFamilyOrganization
and you can personally contact Wes at: cwcpsc@bellsouth.net or by phone: 859-527-0332 or my regular mail at 890 River Hill Drive, Richmond, Kentucky 40475


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=16370

Britain Scraps Child Support Agency While Republicans Remain Sedimentary
by David R. UsherPosted Aug 08, 2006
Last week, British ministers announced their intent to demolish the national Child Support Agency (CSA). They have realized it is an overbearing, expensive failure hurting marriage, driving divorce, and placing the government in the middle of never-ending power-squabbles over money and children. They plan to return responsibility to parents who (for the most part) will be expected work out their own support and parenting arrangements.