Friday, April 25, 2008

Joseph Lambert Stepping Down as Chief Justice




Lambert is stepping down as Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court.

The announcement came yesterday from the Commonwealth News Center.


Lambert is praised as having accomplished many great things, but these praises come from those who generally have a proprietary interest in the process as system insiders. Among the many great things accomplished has in reality been a huge expansion of the Judicial Bureacracy and Legal Machinary. Praised for the creation of many "specialty" courts, flavors A-Z, and billions of taxpayer money for "new judicial centers".


These new judicial center expansion programs have come to a grinding HALT under the crashing state budgets. In reality, a gang of theives has been voting themselves Largess from the taxpayers dole for the last 30 years.


Measured through the eyes of the Majority of Parents and children "Rendered" in Lamberts "family courts" has been more misery than you could imagine. Abuses of power that subject to unjust treatment, deprivations of rights, and extortion of money.
There is something that drives this. To get a better understanding into the forces behind it we turn to an article by Carey Roberts published in January 2004.
The article WOMEN’S BIRTH-RIGHT UNDER ATTACK BY FEM-SOCIALISTS ,
shows us the agenda behind to judicial policy being applied.


Socialist Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, once made this cold-blooded remark, "The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." And when asked about China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard, former head of the NOW, admitted in a 1989 interview, "I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world."

So the disclosure of secret documents from the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), recently published in the federal Congressional Record (www.c-fam.org/pdfs/SecretProabortion InternationalLitigationStrategy.pdf), only confirms our worst fears.
The documents provide many other examples of the subversive feminist-socialist agenda:

1. One memo claims that treaties such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantee women's right to "reproductive health," which is a well-known code phrase for "abortion on demand." Clearly, there is something frightening about claiming a treaty designed to protect human rights provides the legal justification for the elimination of life.
The memo also admits the deceptive nature of the pro-abortion lobby: "there is a stealth quality to the work: we are achieving incremental recognition of values without a huge amount of scrutiny from the opposition."

2. A second memo specifically targets under-age girls. The CRR advocates provision of reproductive health services for girls without parental knowledge or consent, and admits this "has always been one of our priority areas."

3. One secret planning document admits the existence of "hostile majorities" in most states, so the "protection of the judiciary" will be needed to thwart the will of the people.

4. One paper outlines recommendations from the CRR directors. One unnamed director ordered that CRR programs be "ruthlessly prioritized." Another admonished, "We have to fight harder, be a little dirtier."

The objective of the abortion advocates is not to protect women"s human rights. Rather, as revealed by the comments of Margaret Sanger and Molly Yard, their ultimate goal is to progressively restrict women's reproductive choices, that is to take away their birth-right.

In entering these documents into the Congressional Register, representative Christopher Smith of New Jersey commented, "It is especially important that policy makers know, and more fully understand, the deceptive practices being employed by the abortion lobby...These papers reveal a Trojan Horse of deceit."
Indeed.


With Lambert stepping down, the next Chief Justice cannot turn a blind eye to widespread abuse, corruption, malpractice, and misconduct. The Next Chief Justice must show that "tort from the bench" in family law will not be tolerated. The people will become better informed about what is at work politically, against them, and against their liberty.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home