Joseph Lambert Stepping Down as Chief Justice
Lambert is stepping down as Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court.
Lambert is praised as having accomplished many great things, but these praises come from those who generally have a proprietary interest in the process as system insiders. Among the many great things accomplished has in reality been a huge expansion of the Judicial Bureacracy and Legal Machinary. Praised for the creation of many "specialty" courts, flavors A-Z, and billions of taxpayer money for "new judicial centers".
These new judicial center expansion programs have come to a grinding HALT under the crashing state budgets. In reality, a gang of theives has been voting themselves Largess from the taxpayers dole for the last 30 years.
Measured through the eyes of the Majority of Parents and children "Rendered" in Lamberts "family courts" has been more misery than you could imagine. Abuses of power that subject to unjust treatment, deprivations of rights, and extortion of money.
There is something that drives this. To get a better understanding into the forces behind it we turn to an article by Carey Roberts published in January 2004.
shows us the agenda behind to judicial policy being applied.
Socialist Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, once made this cold-blooded remark, "The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." And when asked about China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard, former head of the NOW, admitted in a 1989 interview, "I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world."
So the disclosure of secret documents from the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), recently published in the federal Congressional Record (www.c-fam.org/pdfs/SecretProabortion InternationalLitigationStrategy.pdf), only confirms our worst fears.
The documents provide many other examples of the subversive feminist-socialist agenda:
1. One memo claims that treaties such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantee women's right to "reproductive health," which is a well-known code phrase for "abortion on demand." Clearly, there is something frightening about claiming a treaty designed to protect human rights provides the legal justification for the elimination of life.
The memo also admits the deceptive nature of the pro-abortion lobby: "there is a stealth quality to the work: we are achieving incremental recognition of values without a huge amount of scrutiny from the opposition."
2. A second memo specifically targets under-age girls. The CRR advocates provision of reproductive health services for girls without parental knowledge or consent, and admits this "has always been one of our priority areas."
3. One secret planning document admits the existence of "hostile majorities" in most states, so the "protection of the judiciary" will be needed to thwart the will of the people.
4. One paper outlines recommendations from the CRR directors. One unnamed director ordered that CRR programs be "ruthlessly prioritized." Another admonished, "We have to fight harder, be a little dirtier."
The objective of the abortion advocates is not to protect women"s human rights. Rather, as revealed by the comments of Margaret Sanger and Molly Yard, their ultimate goal is to progressively restrict women's reproductive choices, that is to take away their birth-right.
In entering these documents into the Congressional Register, representative Christopher Smith of New Jersey commented, "It is especially important that policy makers know, and more fully understand, the deceptive practices being employed by the abortion lobby...These papers reveal a Trojan Horse of deceit."
Indeed.
With Lambert stepping down, the next Chief Justice cannot turn a blind eye to widespread abuse, corruption, malpractice, and misconduct. The Next Chief Justice must show that "tort from the bench" in family law will not be tolerated. The people will become better informed about what is at work politically, against them, and against their liberty.
Judicial Nepotisms and the Proprietary Bar Association
This is an excerpt and expose of the story that broke upon - The Polwatchers Blog April 8, 2008
http://polwatchers.typepad.com/pol_watchers/2008/04/girlfriend-of-c.htmlGirlfriend of chief justice's son gets court jobBy Brandon Ortiz
mailto:OrtizBORTIZ@HERALD-LEADER.COMPlease offer your comments at the above website, and thanks to Mr. Ortiz for this expose.A woman dating a son of Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert has been hired for a human resources job opening that was not advertised.
Joanna M. Cruz, 26, started at the new position of benefits administrator for the Court of Justice on March 1. The job pays $39,684 a year and is responsible for planning and directing benefits, such as unemployment insurance and worker's compensation, for the court system's 4,000 employees.
Cruz is dating Joseph P. Lambert, 23, whom she met while attending Princeton University. She graduated in June 2004 with a bachelor's degree in religion.
Joseph P. Lambert is the chief justice's oldest son.
"The position should have been posted and advertised," said Richard Beliles, chairman of Common Cause of Kentucky, a government watchdog group. "It does sort of get my attention."
Nemes said he leapt at the chance to hire Cruz when he learned she and Joseph P. Lambert were moving to Kentucky from Texas.
"I bet you in 10 years she'll be running this shop," Nemes said. "She is just phenomenal."
So the Quetion is: How much more obvious corruption in the unaccountable Ky Courts of "Just-us" Bar and Bench hegemony do the people of kentucky need to experience before they stand up and say "Hell no!" ?These people have evolved themselves to near Godhood since 1976 with the Judicial Article. The Supreme Court Justices set the tone for how local courts conduct themselves, or misconduct themselves. The current climate in Ky Courts is extensively polluted and corrupted, especially Family and CPS cases, where human trafficking, extortion, and racketeering occur. The oversight committes are told by Cheif Justice Lambert to "stand down"- do not hold judges accountable.This is the policy under Lambert and at least 3 other justices.The Ky Bar does not hold attorneys who intentionally injure parents and their children accountable. Their in on it. There profiting from all this human trafficking.Constitutionally secured and protected rights? Forget it. their above the law. they can rob you, kidnapp your children, at laugh at you while they do it. It is Out Of Control.Can the General Assembly help? only if the people rise up and make them.
Federally Subsidized Marxist Policies Undermining Local Communites
The Federal Goverment funds the detruction of Family to the tune of 1 billion dollars a year, since 1990
Family Law Advocates Need to Counter DV Falsehoods
Department of Justice statistics show domestic violence (DV) in married, intact couples is only 2% (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/intimate/victims.htm). So why do the public and state legislators believe that partner violence is out of control?
Each year the federal government bankrolls the domestic violence industry to the tune of $1 billion. That money is authorized by the Violence Against Woman Act (VAWA) and other laws.
Much of that money is awarded to state domestic violence coalitions. In at least three cases – New Hampshire, Maine, and West Virginia – these coalitions have denied membership to organizations that proposed to provide domestic violence services to male victims of domestic violence in spite of Section 40002(b)(8) of VAWA 2005 which states, "Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits and services under this title".
State DV coalitions often sponsor biased training programs to legislators, judges, and the public, falsely claiming that domestic violence is "overwhelmingly" perpetrated by men. (For examples, see RADAR’s Special Report, "Education for Injustice" – http://mediaradar.org/docs/RADARreport-Education-For-Injustice.pdf)
In addition, state DV coalitions have become lobbying organizations. In many states they have successfully pressured legislators to weaken protective order standards and enact all-encompassing definitions of DV. They have also pushed state legislatures to adopt mandatory arrest polices, no-drop prosecution, and primary aggressor laws.
Federally-subsidized state DV advocates have used the domestic violence issue to defeat family law reforms, as well:
North Dakota’s shared parenting initiative in 2006
West Virginia’s shared parenting bill in 2008
New Hampshire’s mutual consent divorce bill in 2008
Virginia’s bill that would have required evidence and a separate finding to restrict a parent’s access to a child in a spousal protective order in 2008
2008 did see one successful attempt to restore fairness and balance to family law. A West Virginia bill was proposed to impose criminal penalties for false accusations of DV and child abuse. The West Virginia bill was recently signed into law, albeit somewhat watered-down from the original version.
It has become clear that family law reform will not succeed until the half-truths and falsehoods of intimate partner violence are addressed.
We encourage persons concerned about family law reform to work together to assure the truth of domestic violence gets out. RADAR has developed a flyer, "It’s Time to Tell the Truth about Domestic Violence": http://mediaradar.org/docs/RADARflyer-Time-to-Tell-the-Truth.pdf. We encourage persons to share this information with legislators and others in your state, so family law reform becomes a reality.
For more information about how you can help repeal bad policy email : cwcpsc@bellsouth.net
